On Nov 21, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Michael H. Georg wrote: > Methinks an audio wiki would be an oxy-moron. Since in nearly all > cases wikis are used to convey information or technical > descriptions, what would be the point of an audio version.
Think mash-ups. Just like a wiki is a "mash-up" of webpages, an audio-wiki could be a mash-up of audio. And, yes, that's differs a bit from the original idea of tightly-coupling the text-wiki to the audio-wiki. I'll elaborate more later. > Spoken language does have a basic unit, it is called a phoneme. > http://the-stewardship.org/research/blte.htm > Reading the article makes me wonder if it can be possible to edit > audio at a basic unit level. Cool. I did not know that. Thanks for the link. Regards, - Robert http://www.cwelug.org/downloads Help others get OpenSource software. Distribute FLOSS for Windows, Linux, *BSD, and MacOS X with BitTorrent _______________________________________________ CWE-LUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.cwelug.org/ http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/
