On Nov 28, 2005, at 12:39 AM, Robert Citek wrote: > On Nov 21, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Michael H. Georg wrote: >> Methinks an audio wiki would be an oxy-moron. Since in nearly all >> cases wikis are used to convey information or technical >> descriptions, what would be the point of an audio version. > > Again, just exploring the space. Video seems to be the obvious next > step.
It's amazing what you find on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Spoken_articles For example, here's the text version of an article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploding_whale and here's the audio version: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Exploding_whale.ogg Regards, - Robert http://www.cwelug.org/downloads Help others get OpenSource software. Distribute FLOSS for Windows, Linux, *BSD, and MacOS X with BitTorrent _______________________________________________ CWE-LUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.cwelug.org/ http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/
