Robert Citek wrote: > On Nov 21, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Michael H. Georg wrote: > >>Methinks an audio wiki would be an oxy-moron. Since in nearly all >>cases wikis are used to convey information or technical >>descriptions, what would be the point of an audio version. > > > Think mash-ups. Just like a wiki is a "mash-up" of webpages, an > audio-wiki could be a mash-up of audio. And, yes, that's differs a > bit from the original idea of tightly-coupling the text-wiki to the > audio-wiki. I'll elaborate more later. > > >>Spoken language does have a basic unit, it is called a phoneme. >>http://the-stewardship.org/research/blte.htm >>Reading the article makes me wonder if it can be possible to edit >>audio at a basic unit level. > > > Cool. I did not know that. Thanks for the link. >
Robert, From you first post my mind went more to a community bot. A string of comment on a topic or discussion. What could be used for joining all the files into one? Also one should think about generating several audio formats. This could be an excellent tool for cert discussions. -- Jerry Hubbard [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ CWE-LUG mailing list [email protected] http://www.cwelug.org/ http://www.cwelug.org/archives/ http://www.cwelug.org/mailinglist/
