Thus spake John Gibbins:
> I'm with you, Jeff, and I wrote  Avalanche Press some time ago to tell them o
> f my views, which exactly match yours. Avalanche doesn't make such good tacti
> cal land games that I feel I miss much there -- PzG isn't any better than (as
>  good as?) CC:E or ASL, and those game have outstanding VASSAL support and CB
>  access as well. However, Avalanche does make a number of operation and strat
> egic land games, and a huge number of naval games of all scales that are well
>  regarded -- sigh. Of course, I think Bennighof misses the point completely a
> bout sales: GMT is EXTREMELY liberal about CB boxes, and publishes most of th
> e rules online soon after publication, and they are doing VERY well (better t
> han Avalanche, without doubt), a good deal because their customers are as pas
> sionate about GMT as the company is about its customers (they're even offerin
> g free games this month to those of their customers recently unemployed!!) --
>  so where do my $400 to $800 of game
>  purchases go every year? Hmmm ... John GibbinsIn a related note; sadly, OSG 
> is another company that hasn't allowed CB boxes after an abortive attempt, so
>  I haven't been buying their stuff, which isn't really duplicated anywhere el
> se -- perhaps now that Zucker

Ditto here. In fact, I'm not even willing to sell the three Avalanche
games I bought before I found out that they don't permit modules to be
distributed online, as then I'd just be encouraging other people to play
Avalanche's games.

-- 
J.

Reply via email to