From: "Matthew Wright", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul wrote:
>Saying that they could have occurred with cans of petrol, or
>clubs, or, well, whatever? Is this what is described as debate? >It sounds
more like carrying on arguments that were lost a >long time ago, way beyond
their logical conclusion................... >As for being a boxer who has
taken too many punches, (as >another correspondent mused about me), well, I
dunno, >maybe. At least boxers usually understand when the bell has >rung
for the final time, and the fight is over, and that >everyone has gone home
and got on with their lives. Some of >them even realise how pathetic it
sounds to drivel on about >fights that you've lost for years and years to
come.
Sorry Paul, I just don't agree with you on this at all. I think its pretty
bloody serious when people use fire or Sarin gas in undergrounds as has
happened, and its is entirely relevant to the debate. Why? Beacuse when
politicians ignore reality and deliberately distort debate to make short
term political gain they are playing with peoples lives and failing to
create sensible laws that adress real criminal motivation. They also debase
democracy and belief in the law. This is exactly what happened after
Dunblane and everybody is right to relentlessly point this out for as long
as it takes. If people do they will win - so a fight for truth is never, and
can never, be over.
--
On the news as we speak is a case in Wales where a man has
apparently poisoned to death his entire family.
Steve.
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________________________________
T O P I C A The Email You Want. http://www.topica.com/t/16
Newsletters, Tips and Discussions on Your Favorite Topics
