Comments from two readers:
----------
From: Derek Bernard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 21, 2000 6:28 PM
To: Peter H Jackson
Subject: Re: Field-BASC Chief Executive confidence vote
> Anyone following this wretched business should read the lead letter in the
current (18 May) issue of Shooting >Times. In it, Charles Nodder... has set
out a lengthy argument in favour of a no-confidence motion. From
>someone whose professional work has involved close co-operation with John
Swift for 17 years, it is quite >the most outspoken and informed criticism I
have seen so far ....
BASC is, by far, the strongest shooting body in the UK. It is extremely
important that it is led well. Can some else post Charles Nodder's letter?
And can John Swift, or someone else at BASC post a thoughtful rebuttal?
Derek Bernard
-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2000 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: CS: Pol-BASC Leadership
Well said, this S.G.M. of BASC will cost around 50,000 pounds and
if it was to succeed (which I doubt) then it would require the council to vote
a motion of no confidence, these are John Swift's friends not foes. So if that
failed which it would, then he would need to go for a vote of no confidence
in council which would cost a further �50,000 a total of �100,000. Plus loads
ands loads of hours, which could all be better spent fighting the real
enemy- the antis, not John swift!
tony whiting
-----
Yes. With the Home Affairs Committee hell-bent on screwing young
shots and a hunting ban before the Scottish parliament, this is
not a good time for in-fighting.
Peter.
-------[Cybershooters contacts]--------
Editor: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website & subscription info: www.cybershooters.org
