On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 12:46:01PM -0500, Harold Hunt wrote: >Those are some very interesting results. I especially like the ones >where Cygwin is 10 to 1000 times slower than Linux :) Oh well... I >can't bitch anymore for fear of obligating myself to contribute to >Cygwin proper.
Hopefully, it stupefyingly obvious why cygwin is slower than linux. cgf
