> >Those are some very interesting results. I especially like the ones > >where Cygwin is 10 to 1000 times slower than Linux :) Oh well... I > >can't bitch anymore for fear of obligating myself to contribute to > >Cygwin proper. > > Hopefully, it stupefyingly obvious why cygwin is slower than linux.
Yes, but it is also stupefyingly obvious that with a lot of hard work certain functions can be sped up, like the speed up done with certain types of fork calls. Thus my statement that I had better shut up before someone suggests that I spend a lot of time trying to speed things up. Harold
