On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 06:17:38PM -0500, John Newman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2019 at 05:29:50PM +0000, jim bell wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 16, 2019, 01:50:43 AM PST, John Newman
> > <j...@synfin.org> wrote:
> > > On Nov 16, 2019, at 2:51 AM, jim bell <jdb10...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > On Saturday, November 16, 2019, 12:22:31 AM PST, John Newman
> > > <j...@synfin.org> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 16, 2019, at 1:37 AM, jim bell <jdb10...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >> >Most people are not anarchists.
> > >
> > >> Mostly because they have grown up their entire lives being unaware of
> > >> the possibility that a society can be run without a centralized,
> > >> heirarchical government. And they were also nearly unaware that some
> > >> non-governmental entity could issue "currency" that people could
> > >> actually use to buy real things. Things have changed, huh?
> > >
> >
> > >Crypto-currency is an important precursor to the technical
> > >problems of AP, but AP isn't just a technical problem. The fact
> > >that people are investing in bitcoin to try to make a big score
> > >has fuck all to do with the ideas behind AP, which involves
> > >financing murder for the greater good (oh, and to deter car
> > >theft :).
> >
> > None of your arguments explain why you think AP won't work. Just explains
> > why YOU don't want to see it work. Can't you see why that is irrelevant
> > for most people?
>
>
> I can see that you're making an irrelevant and poorly constructed
> argument :) For one thing, I layed out quite clearly what I think
> the weaknesses of AP are, you can re-read my previous email if you
> like. It's pretty simple stuff - I lack faith in the "human spirit"
> to prevail over the global orwellian nightmare into which we are
> devolving, and disagree with you that the ruling class will accept
> the assassinations of themselves or their henchmen without fighting
> back. It has nothing to do with my own desires about AP working or
> not working. Of course I agree that tyrannicide is a noble and moral
> goal. Although... killing people for petty theft is not, and
> positioning AP as a functional replacement for the current criminal
> justice system is fucking insane.
This provokes a simmering thought to the surface of a lone neurone,
regarding just one of many possible escalations:
The mobbish public in their hasty and unthinking zeal to "send a
message" could at some point target a tyrant/ oligarch's child/ren.
That might sound outlandish and "never possible" at first glance, but
let's consider possible scenario:
- Epstein turns out to be alive.
- Pedophile hate rises and fueled with slut media advert sales.
- A photo of Clinton and Epstein banging a 12 year old becomes public.
- Pedophile hate reaches fever pitch.
- Epstein and Clinton are bunkered down with their own private merc
army - cannot be personally "AP"ed.
- Devastated souls "tortured at a young age" unite to "end the
Clinton" genetic line, once and for all.
- All of the above happens in a very short time period, say 48
hours, with global P2P coverage and hysteria, with no relevant
time for anyone to step back and slow the lynch.
- And remember, it's only the 1 in a 1000 or the 1 in 10,000 humans
who need to be the unbalanced, tortured, reacting unthinking ones
who pitch in an average of $10 each, and we're talking $380,000
to $3.8 million, immediately slushing around the world's most
efficient conceivable anonymous assassination market,
to "end the Clinton line, once and for all, children,
grandchildren, the lot".
