At 8:52 PM -0400 6/17/00, petro wrote:
> >At 01:33 6/16/2000 -0400, petro wrote:
>>> Depending on what you mean by "recognized", it has. There
>>>was a decision in British Courts that Sealand was outside the
>>>jurisdiction of the courts, and the Dutch sent a diplomat to
>>>discuss releasing some POW after the Prince had to storm his castle
>>>to get it back from some dutch mercenaries. The Dutch tried to get
>>>England to pressure Sealand to release them, but England said "not
>>>our jurisdiction, it's a sovereign country.
>>
>>I addressed this in an earlier post. But since you feel so strongly
>>that you're right, why don't you provide a quote from that ruling
> >that backs up your claim?
Are you responding to your own posts, or is there some reason you
snipped the reference to Declan?
(What is _wrong_ with some of you folks? Were your raised on game
preserves in Kenya?)
--Tim May
--
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES: 831-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
"Cyphernomicon" | black markets, collapse of governments.
