On Sep 8, 2008, at 7:41 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > I have some working code following Dag advices (BTW, that transform > stuff its a real win!).
Yes, it certainly is! One thing that worries me is that adding a bunch of tree traversals starts to slow things down--at the very least we should have a transform that doesn't descend into function bodies for speed reasons for stuff like this. > Now I would like to know your opinions about > how the signatures should be rendered. Robert, if you see this, please > enter the discussion. I'd render them the natural way, e.g. [return-type] name([type] arg, [type] arg, ...) - Robert > > > On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >>> Would it be possible to tell Cython/Pyrex to add a line in docstings >>> with function/method signatures? Or should this wait until >>> Cython/Pyrex supports PEP 3107 (Function Annotations)? >> >> Just for the archives, this is actually already a trac ticket. >> >> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/2 >> >> Stefan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cython-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev >> > > > > -- > Lisandro Dalcín > --------------- > Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) > Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) > Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) > PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina > Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 > _______________________________________________ > Cython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
