On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Additionally, for 'def' functions, I have no idea how to provide a >> good 'return-type'. > > Not sure I'm understanding your question... for def functions the > return type is always object, which is implied (i.e. one doesn't have > to explicitly write "object").
Well, I believe saying a function returns 'object' is equivalent to say nothing :-). Perhaps this should wait until functions annotations are supported. >> We should handle default aguments; I'm currently using >> 'arg.default.compile_time_value(None)' (I'm passing 'None' to the call >> because not sure at this point what to pass). If this fails, I just >> use '<???>'. > > That sounds like a good first pass to me. I think a context object > goes here, right? Yes, but I'm not sure where to get it. Dag, please help me!! > - Robert > _______________________________________________ > Cython-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev > -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
