Hi, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn >> For my own uses, gcc still uses *a lot* more running-time than Cython,
Same for lxml. Cython is still several times faster than gcc, at least with a high optimisation level. It has become slower during the summer, though, so I think the transformations take their CPU cycles. But they also enabled a lot of great features and optimisations that really pay for the additional run-time. > That's the situation for me, too. As a side note, I never experienced > any speed-up from using a compiled 'Scanners.so' in my projects. The gain is not large, but it does make a difference if you have a lot of Cython code to parse. Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
