On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Lisandro simply shouldn't call self.visitchildren in visit_FuncDefNode, > no new transform type is needed. >
OK, I'm not visiting children. However, what should I do if I want to 'push/pop' the class name where a method is defined? > > For my own uses, gcc still uses *a lot* more running-time than Cython, > so I don't have an itch to scratch here -- how are things in SAGE? That's the situation for me, too. As a side note, I never experienced any speed-up from using a compiled 'Scanners.so' in my projects. -- Lisandro Dalcín --------------- Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
