Hi Melanie In our case we have used the second format but with the following style of url
http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo#ObjectName_@@data.code@@ I am wondering as we have used # in the uri whether Jena has taken this to be wrong for the dump. It works if I run the server but not if I use dump. Martin On 27/06/2013 17:37, Melanie Courtot wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Do you have a small example? > > I use both a relative URI with d2rq:uriPattern > "@@positiveData.key_ID|urlify@@" and an absolute URI with d2rq:uriPattern > "http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/@@data.code@@"; in the same mapping file, and > I get the expected output, i.e. in the first case my base URI is prepended, > while in the second the URI is kept as is. > > I use dump-rdf -b "my-base-uri". > > Cheers, > Melanie > > > On 2013-06-27, at 7:46 AM, martin roberts wrote: > >> Hi >> can you explain why the dump-rdf feature does not use the uriPattern >> properties for generate the full URI for the objects extracted, but >> instead uses the base uri passed in? >> >> Is there a way to make this work? >> >> Martin >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: >> >> Build for Windows Store. >> >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> d2rq-map-devel mailing list >> d2rq-map-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/d2rq-map-devel > --- > Mélanie Courtot > Ph.D. Candidate, > BCCRC - Terry Fox Laboratory - 12th floor > 675 West 10th Avenue > Vancouver, BC > V5Z 1L3, Canada > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ d2rq-map-devel mailing list d2rq-map-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/d2rq-map-devel
