On Oct 21, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> The tests used to work, so perhaps that expectation wasn't
> unfounded at
> the time?
Dunno, but UserSQL has *always* been absolute, with no mods by the
framework.
> We should write tests for all cases. So, if tests for the
> sqlbuilder are
> missing, those should be written. And if tests for UserSQL are broken,
> those should be fixed. But it isn't either/or.
I meant that there are two ways to fix this: stay with UserSQL and
write the correct code, making it a test of how well the author of
the test wrote the SQL, or change it to SQLBuilder, and make it a
test of how well the framework manages parent-child requeries.
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
