On Oct 22, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
> The filtering is an assumption about the various tests, but not the
> point of the test itself. The test assumes that Dabo is going to
> correctly set the child filter based on the parent record. Else,
> what's
> the point of having parent/child relationships?
Exactly my point. If the goal is to test how *the framework* is
doing filtering, then UserSQL should never be used, since the whole
point of UserSQL is to tell Dabo to not touch anything and just
execute what is written.
>> If I'm setting UserSQL, I'm *explicitly* saying that I want to
>> control the SQL, and that the framework should not mess with it.
>
> If I'm setting UserSQL, and FillLinkFromParent, and LinkField, and it
> has a Parent, I'm pretty clearly stating that I expect a filter on the
> parent record.
No, you're pretty clearly stating that you don't understand UserSQL.
Maybe it's the name that needs revising; what would you suggest for a
property that means "Execute this exact SQL statement. Don't mess
with it at all, as I know what I'm doing."
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
