On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Richard Bejtlich wrote: : I'm glad you thought it worthwhile to analyze whatever you analyzed, but : after our report was public, the heads of the House and Senate Intel : Committees, NSA, and others I won't name, said Mandiant got the : attribution correct.
Because the government, also using closed sources and voodoo, is always 100% accurate? Please. J. Oquendo shows his methodology using your data, which doesn't match your conclusions. How about you answer his sincere question with a real answer, not who you rub dicks with? : > With all due respect to your researchers, colleagues, etc, : > I took your APT1 data, ran it through all sorts of analysis' : > all sorts of recon and I could not for the life of my come : > to the same conclusions that you guys did. : > : > All your data run through Sentinel Analysis : > http://www.infiltrated.net/aptredux/ : > : > There is no voodoo, dirty tricks there, its all recorded : > for all to see. Here is a mind map of all of Mandiant's : > data: : > : > http://infiltrated.net/straggler-f211596a8ac0cac13983ad2b98a71108/straggler-mapped.html : > : > 70% plus, were mapped to one industry, not CN government. : > Did you guys (Mandiant) omit some secret sauce, because I : > still have a difficult time piecing together how - outside : > of an IP address, and one name (UglyGorilla) - you guys : > can even attribute this to CN gov. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
