...and this is why I don't usually respond here. It's time for me to leave the list.
Good luck, Richard On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:28 PM, security curmudgeon <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Richard Bejtlich wrote: > > : I'm glad you thought it worthwhile to analyze whatever you analyzed, but > : after our report was public, the heads of the House and Senate Intel > : Committees, NSA, and others I won't name, said Mandiant got the > : attribution correct. > > Because the government, also using closed sources and voodoo, is always > 100% accurate? Please. > > J. Oquendo shows his methodology using your data, which doesn't match > your conclusions. How about you answer his sincere question with a real > answer, not who you rub dicks with? > > > : > With all due respect to your researchers, colleagues, etc, > : > I took your APT1 data, ran it through all sorts of analysis' > : > all sorts of recon and I could not for the life of my come > : > to the same conclusions that you guys did. > : > > : > All your data run through Sentinel Analysis > : > http://www.infiltrated.net/aptredux/ > : > > : > There is no voodoo, dirty tricks there, its all recorded > : > for all to see. Here is a mind map of all of Mandiant's > : > data: > : > > : > > http://infiltrated.net/straggler-f211596a8ac0cac13983ad2b98a71108/straggler-mapped.html > : > > : > 70% plus, were mapped to one industry, not CN government. > : > Did you guys (Mandiant) omit some secret sauce, because I > : > still have a difficult time piecing together how - outside > : > of an IP address, and one name (UglyGorilla) - you guys > : > can even attribute this to CN gov. _______________________________________________ Dailydave mailing list [email protected] https://lists.immunityinc.com/mailman/listinfo/dailydave
