I don't understand why you would think that. Handing control of the Internet to Paul V. is obviously not a solution to the concentration of trust issue. The problem is not who is in control but the monopoly of control.
A system of multiple DLV registries with different signing keys would be much better. Especially if zones were signed by multiple registries. On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2012, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > I think that is a rather naive assessment. >> Most of us do not want to be dependent on a single root of trust that is >> ultimately under the physical control of VeriSign and the legal >> control of ICANN, a body whose insistence that it is above criticism >> should be deeply troubling. Attempts to concentrate trust in one place >> have invariably proved to be unstable. >> >> DLV is not the solution but it may be a useful contribution to a solution. >> > > You are confusing the DLV method with the dlv.isc.org instance. > > Paul > -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
