On 09/03/2015 15:43, Warren Kumari wrote:
[ Top post ]
So, we have had a reasonable amount of discussion here, but only from
a limited number of participants. In many cases it is unclear to me if
people are OK with progressing hte document (once their comments are
addressed), or if they dislike the document...
So, I'm extending this till this Friday (Friday the 13th!). Paul W
will also be releasing a new version of this document with many of the
comments integrated. Can people please have a look at the new version
(I think it will be out in a few hours), and let me know if:
A: their comments / issues have been addressed, and
B: are you OK with the general document? A clear "Yes, this is good"
or "No, worst idea ever" would be useful.
I'd really like more then 3 or 4 people commenting.
Late review of the document:
The document looks good to me and I support its publication. Some
nits/minor things:
2.3. The OPENPGPKEY RDATA presentation format
The RDATA Presentation Format, as visible in textual zone files,
consists of a single OpenPGP public key as defined in
Section 5.5.1.1. of [RFC4880] encoded in Base64 [RFC4648]
The base64 section should say "Section 4 of [RFC4648]". Because there
is also section 5, which uses a diffent alphabet.
In 3.1:
o Everything after a "+" symbol is dynamc.
Typo: dynamic.
If you want an informative reference here, you can reference RFC 5233.
[email protected]
maps to [email protected].
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
