Thanks everyone for your feedback and comments, the WGLC is now closed. I think that it looks like there is strong consensus for publishing, but I'm hoping to re-read all the comments on my flight home (currently sitting in TXL) to see if I've missed anything obvious...
W On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On 13 Mar 2015, at 18:10, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Appendix A: >>> Two things: I suggest moving this to -usage and adding pseudocode >>> examples. The latter mostly to encourage more implementations. >> >> I thought about keeping it software agnostic, but in the end figured >> since gnupg has been around for over a decade, it is kind of similar >> to using openssl commands as example. > > I agree. Some real world usage is good. > >> But I have no problems making >> this software agnostic if the WG thinks that is more appropriate. > > More examples are always better :-). (I am not suggesting you change > anything, if you can't think of any). > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
