On Sat, 14 Mar 2015, John Levine wrote:
In article <CAHw9_iLafyHnbnii2huxoR48rybydu-tT4rScm6oo9p==yt...@mail.gmail.com>
you write:
Thanks everyone for your feedback and comments, the WGLC is now closed.
I think that it looks like there is strong consensus for publishing,
but I'm hoping to re-read all the comments on my flight home
(currently sitting in TXL) to see if I've missed anything obvious...
I am fairly sure that the current text in section 3.1 will never get
through the IESG. Telling people to guess e-mail addresses is, well,
just wrong.
The draft is fixable, but it's a fairly significant change.
Section 3.1 was never meant to dictate processing. It was only meant to
warn about email address mapping services out in the wild that we know
about. I can try and come up with better text if that solved this issue
for you.
Paul
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
