In article <CAHw9_iLafyHnbnii2huxoR48rybydu-tT4rScm6oo9p==yt...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >Thanks everyone for your feedback and comments, the WGLC is now closed. > >I think that it looks like there is strong consensus for publishing, >but I'm hoping to re-read all the comments on my flight home >(currently sitting in TXL) to see if I've missed anything obvious...
I am fairly sure that the current text in section 3.1 will never get through the IESG. Telling people to guess e-mail addresses is, well, just wrong. The draft is fixable, but it's a fairly significant change. R's, John _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
