On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:08:45PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> On 20/04/15 17:01, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Should I cut another version with editorial changes based on your
> > review prior to IETF LC?
>
> I guess that's one for the WG chairs.
OK. Any word from the chairs then?
> But I don't think we bottomed out on the TLS versioning thing and
> the relationship with recent related BCPs did we?
I don't expect much/any further discussion. I am ready to replace
all mention of SSL 3.0 with TLS 1.0. Given that the protocol is
opportunistic, requiring anything stronger is I think counter-productive.
Can we move forward with s/SSL 3.0/TLS 1.0/g? This modifies just
the first paragraph of 8.1 and is not a big deal.
I don't recall seeing any other recent BCPs at issue in this thread.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
