> On Apr 20, 2015, at 12:34 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:08:45PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote: > >> On 20/04/15 17:01, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > >>> Should I cut another version with editorial changes based on your >>> review prior to IETF LC? >> >> I guess that's one for the WG chairs. > > OK. Any word from the chairs then?
Update, > >> But I don't think we bottomed out on the TLS versioning thing and >> the relationship with recent related BCPs did we? > > I don't expect much/any further discussion. I am ready to replace > all mention of SSL 3.0 with TLS 1.0. Given that the protocol is > opportunistic, requiring anything stronger is I think counter-productive. > > Can we move forward with s/SSL 3.0/TLS 1.0/g? This modifies just > the first paragraph of 8.1 and is not a big deal. > > I don't recall seeing any other recent BCPs at issue in this thread. > > -- > Viktor. > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
