On Jan 20, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 1/20/16 6:21 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: >> We have no plans to meet as we are trying to shut the WG down. > > I am not at all a fan of extending working groups beyond their > natural lives (and in a few cases extending them to their > natural lives) but this surprises me quite a bit, as there's > quite a bit of useful work in the queue, particularly around > end user credential for various applications. If dane isn't > going to stick around I think there's a fairly compelling case > for a maintenance and extension working group. I think many > of these documents (and I can't believe I'm about to say this) > are more appropriate as working group products rather than > as individual contributions. +1 I believe that there is more work to do around DANE (particularly non-TLS applications, i.e., e-mail, plus implementation interoperability), and there should be a place in the IETF for this work to be done. Sean
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
