>First... +100 to what Shumon said! We are at the stage of DANE deployment >where, while the protocol may be >well-developed, the deployment is only now beginning... and I think it would >send a wrong message to kill >of the group now.
I'm sorry, but this shows a complete misunderstanding of what a working group is and how the IETF works. WGs exist to develop standards, following their charters. The whole reason that WGs have charters is so they don't just drift on forever. If, as it appears, DANE has finished the work in its charter, it's time to shut it down. In the past, some WG's mailing lists have stayed open for discussions of topics related to the former WG's work. It looks line DANE could be a candidate for that. R's, John _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
