Hiya,

On 08/02/17 15:25, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Still not impressed.

While I may well agree, that doesn't answer my question,
which doesn't relate to the application itself but to
the IPR declaration's statement that licensing information
will be provided "later."

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
dane@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to