Hiya, Thanks for checking. As I didn't see any objections, I've asked for IETF LC to be started.
Cheers, S. On 13/02/17 17:32, Warren Kumari wrote: > Dear WG. > > Unless you explicitly let us know that you are NOT OK with the current > IPR declaration ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2468/ ) by > Thursday, we will be progressing the document. > Personally I'm not thrilled with the situation, but I don't really > think there is anything we can do about it... > > On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Marc Groeneweg <marc.groene...@sidn.nl> >> wrote: >>>>> the IPR declaration's statement that licensing information >>>>> will be provided "later." >>> As we had with the keyrelay draft in regext (and the draft of Peter Koch >>> with DNSSEC transfers). >> >> Can you remind us what ended up happening with those two? I vaguely >> remember some discussion about it being hard to get a commitment, and >> that "later" seemed like a DoS on the process, but was there ever a >> resolution? >> >> Is the WG OK with this, or do you feel that we need to try and get the >> IPR statement updated? (Remembering that, AFAIK, we cannot do anything >> other than ask nicely...) >> >> W >> >> >>> >>> <SNAP/> >>> >>>> I see that Verisign has offered a free-unless-you-sue-us license for >>>> other patent applications, like this one, dunno why they do for some >>>> but not others: >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2703/ >>> Other than that the suggested draft is also by Verisign themselves? >>> >>>> In any event, you alrady know what my suggested solution is. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Marc >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dane mailing list >>> dane@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane >> >> >> >> -- >> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad >> idea in the first place. >> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing >> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair >> of pants. >> ---maf > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list dane@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
