On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 5:31 PM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > > Hiya, > > On 12/02/17 22:27, Warren Kumari wrote: >> do you feel that we need to try and get the >> IPR statement updated? > > I not sure but if that question is addressed at me, then I > am not trying to insist that the IPR declaration be updated, > but just want to check that the WG are ok with that "later" > statement, despite it now being "much later."
Sorry, nope, that was directed at the WG... I personally think that this is "OK" -- not great, but.... > >> (Remembering that, AFAIK, we cannot do anything >> other than ask nicely...) > > Yep. We can't force anyone to update a declaration and as > noted there was at least one other case where a year went > by with folks asking and not seeing any update happen in > a quite similar case involving the same entity. Yup. W > > S. > > -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dane mailing list dane@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
