On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:18:56PM +0100, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > I think this is probably fine, but it's a little bit scary. The reason is > > that I this change does affect the semantics of a patch. It's probably > > fine, since I think coalesce is only used on pending changes, > > According to some guy called David, it is ;-) > > http://darcs.net/pipermail/darcs-devel/2006-January/003849.html > > > but I'd like to see a bit of a review of where coalesce is used, > > So would I.
We'd both like it, but I think we could put this change in before the review is done. It only has effects in rare corner cases, so even if it were a bug (which I doubt), it'd be one with little effect. -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
