On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 04:36:09PM -0800, David Roundy wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:27:34PM +0100, Eric Y. Kow wrote: > > I commented out coalesce and the things which depended on it. The > > casualties: > > Thanks for checking this out! > > > commute_split > > unravel > > merger_equivalent > > reorder_and_coalesce (used in Repository.get_unrecorded) > > canonize (used in AmendRecord and Diff) > > try_to_shrink (used in DarcsRepo.sift_for_pending) > > > > Are you sure this is ok? (Sorry for the delays, Malebria) > > Yeah, that's okay. I'm sure.
Maybe I'm a bit late to report, but I've come to the same conclusion. I was unsure about 'unravel' and 'merger_equivalent'. I have checked that they are only called for mergers, although I don't understand why mergers is ok. Well, now it's sort of triple-checked. :-) -- Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
