On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 08:40:14 -0800, David Roundy wrote: > I'd prefer if you (or someone > else) could double-check this, to be sure that the commute or merge of a > merger is not affected by coalesce. If I can get confirmation on that, > I'll give the green light for this change. Perhaps the easiest way is to > chop out the code for coalese from this file, and see if we can still > compile commute (except for commute_split, which I believe is okay).
I commented out coalesce and the things which depended on it. The casualties: commute_split unravel merger_equivalent reorder_and_coalesce (used in Repository.get_unrecorded) canonize (used in AmendRecord and Diff) try_to_shrink (used in DarcsRepo.sift_for_pending) Are you sure this is ok? (Sorry for the delays, Malebria) -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français.
pgpkdLtytv3Bw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
