On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 09:27:34PM +0100, Eric Y. Kow wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 08:40:14 -0800, David Roundy wrote: > > I'd prefer if you (or someone > > else) could double-check this, to be sure that the commute or merge of a > > merger is not affected by coalesce. If I can get confirmation on that, > > I'll give the green light for this change. Perhaps the easiest way is to > > chop out the code for coalese from this file, and see if we can still > > compile commute (except for commute_split, which I believe is okay). > > I commented out coalesce and the things which depended on it. The > casualties:
Thanks for checking this out! > commute_split > unravel > merger_equivalent > reorder_and_coalesce (used in Repository.get_unrecorded) > canonize (used in AmendRecord and Diff) > try_to_shrink (used in DarcsRepo.sift_for_pending) > > Are you sure this is ok? (Sorry for the delays, Malebria) Yeah, that's okay. I'm sure. -- David Roundy http://www.darcs.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
