On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:35:32AM -0800, Daan Leijen wrote: > > > and that the point is to keep devopers from creating such patches in > > > the first place, not identifying them after the fact. > > > > So create a posthook that says "if changes --match="filenames blah" ; > then echo > > 'NO CROSSING DOMAINS PLEASE' ; fi". > > Ah, but that wouldn't work on any non-unix system. I would prefer that > darcs would offer a portable solution that is not dependent on scripts. > > This is also my objection to have the list of domains as a script; I > would > much rather see a static, declarative! list of domains (even if that is > more constrained).
I didn't intend to force everybody to use unix shell here. You would be able to choose your language, so you could use a list of domains, or Haskell. Right now I think the best way would be to extend hooks (if neccesary) so you can implement such a feature yourself on top of them. BTW, *nix users are plugging darcs into the overall *nix philosophy, where you can connect small tools together to get what you want. Do you want to ban this from us because it doesn't work on Windows? (and I think it works to some degree with cygwin, etc, doesn't it?) Best regards Tomasz -- I am searching for programmers who are good at least in (Haskell || ML) && (Linux || FreeBSD || math) for work in Warsaw, Poland _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
