>> - on the other hand, for hashed repositories --no-working-directory >> would be less transparent than a hypothetical --no-pristine-tree, >> because of our internal gobbledegooky filenames... we would have >> to do something like darcs show contents and darcs show files to >> retrieve files, yuck :-( >> > > This isn't an issue specific to working-treeless repos. Any tool that > wants to know what *Darcs* thinks is in the repo should be using the > show commands, not just catting whatever happens to be in the working > directory. Cf. the arguments for/against the --hashed format. >
This is what my upgrade to TortoiseDarcs 2 does. The current functionality of "show files" and "whatsnew -s --look-for-adds" is sufficient, but in the release I'll write down my wish list. Kari _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
