On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:50:11 +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > It's not too late to switch to an odd/evens numbering scheme ;-)
I forgot something, why do I always forget something?
I meant to paste in the table from the mail I linked to make it concrete
what I had in mind:
============================= ======= ======== =================
task current odd/even comments
============================= ======= ======== =================
Name previous release 2.6 2.6
Name work in HEAD 2.6 2.7 [1]_
(before cutting the branch)
Name next release 2.7 2.8
Indicate that we have a 2.6.97 2.7.97 equivalent
soon-to-be-released version
Name release branch darcs 2.6.x 2.7.y odd/even is more
(making distinction against distinct
current release)
Name ongoing work in HEAD 2.7 2.9
after release branch has been
cut
============================== ======= ======== ================
.. [1] Under the current scheme, we could also say "2.7" in HEAD
but that would be a lie, because it's not 2.7 yet
--
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
