On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 20:38:08 +0200, Reinier Lamers wrote: > Yes, it's yes!
Hooray! Uh-oh, I just thought of a potential downside, which is that it makes us reach 2.10 by July 2011 (instead of in Jan 2013), but I think folks are used to the points not being decimals by now. > However, I'm against using it for 2.5. It would mean re-branding the much- > discussed 2.5 stable release to 2.6, and that would cause much more confusion > than using the .98.1 system. OK > FWIW, personally I never found the 2.x beta y = 2.(x-1).98.y system very > confusing, but I can't deny the odds/evens system is clearer. :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
