Hi,
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 09:53:35AM +0100, Eric Kow wrote:
> ============================= ======= ======== =================
> task current odd/even comments
> ============================= ======= ======== =================
[...]
> Name ongoing work in HEAD 2.7 2.9
> after release branch has been
> cut
Are you really about to have two actively maintained branches (even
aka stable vs. odd aka development)?
I'm not sure wether this would be a good idea (unless the odd
branches are a very short-living species); active developers would
have more work, people would probably do less testing.
And with long-living odd branches there's the danger of people
becoming sloppy and introducing bugs/breaking things more often
because it's `the unstable branch'. Of course, this depends on the
people involved, so it won't be happen to darcs ;-)
Ciao,
Kili
ps: fwiw, I've absolutely no problems with some 2.4.99.* as a beta
series for 2.5.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
