When I apply the 'denoise (profiled)' onto a fairly raw image the
results, on my data, look quite acceptable. I have been trying to see
which modules that I am using are creating more noise than others.
In another test I have used the para. mask to eliminate some processing
from sky areas ... it is a bit tedious but it appears to help. I still
feel that the blue is the trouble-maker.
On 03/10/2018 04:56 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2018 16:44:24 +0100, David Vincent-Jones wrote:
>> Your examples interest me since they are shown on a blue subject. My
>> experience with a fully profiled sensor is that the 'basic' Denoise
>> (profiled) works quite well by itself EXCEPT for blue sky areas.
>> My sky areas tend to form into rosette clumps whenever some reasonable
>> degree of processing is applied. It has led me to believe that it is the
>> blue color that is causing the greatest problem.
> That's not my experience -- I'm seeing clumps like this in plenty of
> other places.
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org