2018-05-15 10:30 GMT+02:00 Remco Viëtor <[email protected]>:
>
> On mardi 15 mai 2018 07:57:47 CEST Yuri wrote:
> > Hello,
> > it's really frustrating but I can't get any usable export to JPEG.
> >
> > I got Sony RAWs shot in sRGB, I wanna simply convert them straight to JPEG.
> > No module tweaking, etc. So I check the image in the 'darkroom' mode -
> > colors and saturation are perfect there.
> Sony here as well.
>

A good old ILCE-7 in my case, if that matters.

> > Then I hit export (no style applied, etc.). Resulting JPEG has
> > oversaturated colors and is a bit darker then in the 'darkroom' mode when
> > viewed with: Android Flicker app, Linux Firefox, Linux Chromium, GNOME
> > Image Viewer, etc.
> >
> > The only app which can display the exported JPEG correctly is GIMP, sure it
> > reports there was an embedid sRGB profile.
>
> And I cannot reproduce your result: an unedited raw exported to jpeg gives
> virtually the same results as shown in DT darkroom, using Linux Firefox or
> Gwenview (both have color management and use the display profile).

I'll provide a DT darkroom vs Linux Firefox side-by-side shot later
today. Any idea how to check Firefox's active display profile/color
mngmt?

> > I've tried playing with Input/Output color profile modules - setting to
> > sRGB - but no luck. The gamut clipping set to sRGB did help a bit though.
> > My DT's display profile is set to sRGB too.
> >
>
> Are you sure color management is enabled for the programs you used, including
> using device profiles (can depend on the version)?

Hmm, I'm not sure. But still, the color representation is strikingly
similar in all those applications/devices I mentioned. Except GIMP and
DT's 'darkroom'.

Is the belief that the sRGB was a "safe-fallback" for all "dumb"
applications like browsers, etc. really that naive?

> (...)
> >
> > Is this trivial task really so hard to do properly? I mean - import,
> > export, Flickr should work intuitively, right?
>
> Well, if that's all you want to do, why not shoot in JPEG (or RAW/Jpeg, if you
> need the raws sometimes)? Darktable can handle jpeg files, it's just not the
> most important usecase.

Sorry, the straight RAW => JPEG scheme was used just to rule out
module interference during this 'weird JPEG colors' debugging session.
My regular work flows tend to be fairly complex...

> ____________________________________________________________________________
> darktable user mailing list
> to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
>
____________________________________________________________________________
darktable user mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]

Reply via email to