https://abload.de/img/firefox_nightly_vs_dayws5w.png snapshot shows DT's 'darkroom' on the right side and Firefox showing the sRGB exported JPEG on the left side.
Firefox has got gfx.color_management.display_profile set to my ICC profile, etc. As mentioned before, opening the JPEG in GIMP works just fine. Any ideas? 2018-05-15 11:17 GMT+02:00 Yuri <[email protected]>: > 2018-05-15 10:30 GMT+02:00 Remco Viëtor <[email protected]>: >> >> On mardi 15 mai 2018 07:57:47 CEST Yuri wrote: >> > Hello, >> > it's really frustrating but I can't get any usable export to JPEG. >> > >> > I got Sony RAWs shot in sRGB, I wanna simply convert them straight to JPEG. >> > No module tweaking, etc. So I check the image in the 'darkroom' mode - >> > colors and saturation are perfect there. >> Sony here as well. >> > > A good old ILCE-7 in my case, if that matters. > >> > Then I hit export (no style applied, etc.). Resulting JPEG has >> > oversaturated colors and is a bit darker then in the 'darkroom' mode when >> > viewed with: Android Flicker app, Linux Firefox, Linux Chromium, GNOME >> > Image Viewer, etc. >> > >> > The only app which can display the exported JPEG correctly is GIMP, sure it >> > reports there was an embedid sRGB profile. >> >> And I cannot reproduce your result: an unedited raw exported to jpeg gives >> virtually the same results as shown in DT darkroom, using Linux Firefox or >> Gwenview (both have color management and use the display profile). > > I'll provide a DT darkroom vs Linux Firefox side-by-side shot later > today. Any idea how to check Firefox's active display profile/color > mngmt? > >> > I've tried playing with Input/Output color profile modules - setting to >> > sRGB - but no luck. The gamut clipping set to sRGB did help a bit though. >> > My DT's display profile is set to sRGB too. >> > >> >> Are you sure color management is enabled for the programs you used, including >> using device profiles (can depend on the version)? > > Hmm, I'm not sure. But still, the color representation is strikingly > similar in all those applications/devices I mentioned. Except GIMP and > DT's 'darkroom'. > > Is the belief that the sRGB was a "safe-fallback" for all "dumb" > applications like browsers, etc. really that naive? > >> (...) >> > >> > Is this trivial task really so hard to do properly? I mean - import, >> > export, Flickr should work intuitively, right? >> >> Well, if that's all you want to do, why not shoot in JPEG (or RAW/Jpeg, if >> you >> need the raws sometimes)? Darktable can handle jpeg files, it's just not the >> most important usecase. > > Sorry, the straight RAW => JPEG scheme was used just to rule out > module interference during this 'weird JPEG colors' debugging session. > My regular work flows tend to be fairly complex... > >> ____________________________________________________________________________ >> darktable user mailing list >> to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected] >> ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
