One of the strengths of darktable is the ability to apply a style over a large number of images that have commonality, this allows at least 'base processing' to be done extreemly efficiently even over hundreds of images being imported from a days work; whereas digikam works (pedantically) on each file as a separate entity. Pulling individual images into digikam as you are currently doing is quite an inefficient system. Been there done that!
Without a doubt there are significant differences between the implementation of the DAM in the 2 programs but now that I am used darktables approach I find it quite reasonable and satisfactory. David On 13-12-02 09:52 AM, Elle Stone wrote: > I use digiKam to locate a raw file and to open it with darktable ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
