Dear all,
thank you for your replies -- very informative and much appreciated.
It seems DT is more suitable for "geeky" users -- users with at least some
linux/unix background?
I have done some searching during the weekend and I think the editing
capabilities of DT are far more than I ever need. What I am not totally
convinced yet is that how DT as a photo manager compares to iPhoto, Picasa
or Lightroom.
The best way to figure it out is of course to start using it for a while
and see it for myself. However the choice of workflow can result in a lot
of pain if done wrong. For example, all the metainfo I did in Picasa cannot
be used in iPhoto, so I have my photos in Picasa *and* iPhoto. Now that
apple has announced that they ditch iPhoto and Aperture, it's really the
time to switch from iPhoto to something else. (But I don't want to switch
from osx to linux yet).
If someone had used another photo manager before switching to DT, can you
briefly comment on pros and cons of DT as a photo manager?
Regards,
Tony
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition
Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows
Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
