Hi, > TLDR; Is there any way to force darktable to use local cache files > even if original files are available? Intent would be to take > advantage of faster drives/storage (SSD's/Ram Drives) while working on > a set of pictures.
No I don't see a solution for this with the current implementation. I thought about inverting the check, that is looking first for the local copy and then for the original one. But this would require a double IO system call for most pictures and would probably slow things down. I've no strong opinion, all this would need some testing. See src/common/image.c function dt_image_full_path(). -- Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://v2p.fr.eu.org http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
