Am Mittwoch, 8. April 2015, 08:25:47 schrieb Pascal Obry: > Hi, > > > TLDR; Is there any way to force darktable to use local cache files > > even if original files are available? Intent would be to take > > advantage of faster drives/storage (SSD's/Ram Drives) while working on > > a set of pictures. > > No I don't see a solution for this with the current implementation. I > thought about inverting the check, that is looking first for the local > copy and then for the original one. But this would require a double IO > system call for most pictures and would probably slow things down.
I agree that it makes sense. And IIRC there is already a flag for cached images in the db (DT_IMAGE_LOCAL_COPY), so that could be used to check where to look for a file. > I've no strong opinion, all this would need some testing. > > See src/common/image.c function dt_image_full_path().
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_ source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
