On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 20:53:17 +0100
Tobias Ellinghaus <h...@gmx.de> wrote:

>Am Samstag, 20. Februar 2016, 09:44:55 schrieb
>darkta...@911networks.com:
>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2016 04:40:12 +1300
>> 
>> johannes hanika <hana...@gmail.com> wrote:  
>> >darkroom mode by itself is in general just a preview and we try to
>> >make it as precise as possible. but if you're using high quality
>> >resampling during export, it'll run a completely different
>> >pipeline.  
>> 
>> Sorry to butt in, but...
>> 
>> Isn't the high quality resampling the default? So shouldn't the
>> export follow the darkroom pipeline?  
>
>During export we can spend more time than while processing a
>darkroom result on the fly. So we default to get better results. If
>it was possible to do that in darkroom we would do it, too, but it
>isn't. Thus it is different. Changing that would mean preferring
>similar results over best possible quality. Which sounds like a bad
>choice.

Still on the export and the high quality sampling. How does this
affects the sharpening on the export?

Is it possible to add some extra sharpening and contrast on the
export when it's for print?

-- 
sknahT

vyS

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=272487151&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to