Thanks. very informative.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Srinivasan Ramani <srinivasan...@gmail.com>wrote: > The NOTA % from my calculations show as 0.64% for Delhi overall. > > There are only four constituencies where NOTA% exceeds margin of victory. > Details are here - > > *constituency* *votes* *candidate* *Vote%* *%Margin bet. Winner/Runner* > *NOTA > More?* DELHI CANTT 478 None of the Above 0.73 0.54 Yes R K PURAM 528 None > of the Above 0.63 0.39 Yes SULTANPUR MAJRA 1232 None of the Above 1.17 > 1.05 Yes VIKASPURI 1426 None of the Above 0.79 0.22 Yes > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Sreenivas KN <aarei...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> i agree with your logic. the latest numbers show 1% for delhi, 3% in >> chhattisgarh, 2% in Rajasthan and MP. NOTA could have had significant >> effect in Delhi and chhattisgarh when the vote share between 2 parties are >> very close and a decimal point shift could lead to significant shifts in >> results. the logic stated in delhi, people who could have gone to vote for >> NOTA (during elections) have chosen AAP on the rebound. would there be a >> way to prove this otherwise >> >> it could give a perspective "what if"? did somebody not put the right >> amount of effort in convincing the NOTA group to vote? the reason for >> interest in NOTA is that 33% of delhites did not vote also. would there be >> some lessons to be learnt from this. >> >> regards. >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Thanks... >>> >>> NOTA numbers for Delhi are very low and practically insignificant. Only >>> 0.5% of the total vote seem to be NOTA and although in some constituencies >>> where difference between the winner and the loser has been very narrow, I >>> am not sure NOTA was the reason for victory/defeat. I think including NOTA >>> would bring about an "induced bias" on the reason for results. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Sreenivas KN <aarei...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Cool job and very fast. >>>> >>>> Can the NOTA numbers / percentages be added for each constituency >>>> database. this could be significant since voter percentages who chose NOTA >>>> can turn the tables... in many places >>>> >>>> good to see it live. many thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Srinivasan Ramani < >>>> srinivasan...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Here's a map I created using Google Fusion Tables - >>>>> http://bit.ly/IWSeCq (Click on constituency to view more details). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Sreenivas KN <aarei...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> hi. >>>>>> >>>>>> yes. the tabular format provides for votes polled against each >>>>>> candidate and constituency wise. looks like we have to scrape the MIS >>>>>> back >>>>>> to xls or some other format and then attach the geocodes already >>>>>> available. >>>>>> >>>>>> for ready made maps - maybe somebody from the TV channels / media who >>>>>> have already done it and used in the election results discussions >>>>>> yesterday >>>>>> (Times NOW had some interesting visualizations) can help. >>>>>> >>>>>> else, it is hard wok for now. :) >>>>>> >>>>>> If somebody can work on the impact of NOTA (none of the above option) >>>>>> on the losers (in terms of margin of loss versus NOTA), it can show some >>>>>> interesting patterns. This is crucial since Chhattisgarh saw a 3% NOTA >>>>>> and >>>>>> the difference between congress and bjp vote share was less than NOTA and >>>>>> New Delhi 1%. this is interesting behavioural science to track. >>>>>> >>>>>> regards. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Pukhraj Singh <pukh...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Konark: Check this >>>>>>> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ConstituencywiseU054.htm?ac=4. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sreenivas: I am really keen to know the margins of the runner-ups, >>>>>>> and other such secondary or tertiary details. Can the ECI's MIS data be >>>>>>> culled and made more interactive? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Sreenivas KN <aarei...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the closest we have for now is the results link below. this MIS >>>>>>>> went live at around 8 pm last evening. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://eciresults.ap.nic.in/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> nevertheless, not user-friendly >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hope this helps for starters... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:02 PM, konark modi >>>>>>>> <modi.kon...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Pukhraj, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Not for the 2013 elections as I am awaiting for data to be >>>>>>>>> released. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For previous years I have done some work with the limited data I >>>>>>>>> could find : >>>>>>>>> http://indiaelecting.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> Konark >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Pukhraj Singh >>>>>>>>> <pukh...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Greetings! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Has someone done advanced analytics for the Delhi results? A >>>>>>>>>> geographical outlay of the vote shares, runner-ups, etc., would be >>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>> useful. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>> Pukhraj >>>>>>>>>> Founder, Abroo >>>>>>>>>> www.abroo.in >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> For more details about this list >>>>>>>>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>>> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> For more details about this list >>>>>>>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> For more details about this list >>>>>>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> For more details about this list >>>>>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> For more details about this list >>>>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>>>> --- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Srinivasan V. Ramani , >>>>> Senior Assistant Editor, >>>>> Economic and Political Weekly , >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> For more details about this list >>>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> For more details about this list >>>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> For more details about this list >>> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "datameet" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >>> >> >> -- >> For more details about this list >> http://datameet.org/discussions/ >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "datameet" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > > -- > For more details about this list > http://datameet.org/discussions/ > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "datameet" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > -- For more details about this list http://datameet.org/discussions/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
