Hi Brian,
Thanks for the update. Since the ;;W option is involved, I would
guess that version 2.6x is necessary. I had wondered about that.
As for field names, spaces, etc., I should know better. I ran into
that problem with Access. I have only used the field names as a
comment, so it has never been a problem.
And thinking back, because of the unique way that DP indexes and
links, I was able to initially create panels and links without using
an unique identifier; i.e.: number. It finally caught up with me, so
I had to retro-fit ID numbers. Ralph Alvy's incrementing formula
using the recursive link really helped with that.
I agree about DPLinks. It is hard to use the output, and as you say,
doesn't show the actual link.
In the XML report, I like the check boxes for selecting the
information shown. I wouldn't mind printing out that heading
information. Maybe in the next tweak?
Thanks again
Rich
At 06:07 PM 5/28/2008, you wrote:
Thanks Rich,
I broke a cardinal sin and didn't ;;W the field name. I will update
it immediately... I never use &'s or even spaces in field names, I
keep fieldnames to just characters and number without punctuation,
so it completely slipped by my thinking...
Thanks
Brian
_______________________________________________
Dataperf mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.dataperfect.nl/mailman/listinfo/dataperf
